...oh. NOW it makes sense.
16 Dec 2003 05:04 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'll get to that bit in a minute. But first, in case the RPage types were wondering: Yes, that one comment of mine refers to someone in particular. He graduated last year and I'll be quite happy if I never have to see him again.
Anyway. Ji - you remember how we were trying to figure out how Small Gods fits into the Discworld timeline? I'm rereading Thief of Time at the moment, and I think I found the answer. It doesn't.
The history of the country of Ephebe was puzzling, for example. Either its famous philosophers lived for a very long time, or inherited their names, or extra bits had been stitched into history there. The history of Omnia was a mess. Two centuries had been folded into one, by the look of it, and it was only because of the mind-set of the Omnians, whose religion mixed the past and future with the present in any case, that it could possibly have passed unnoticed.
--page 157 of the American (far as I know, anyway...) hardback. Susan reading up on history and paying attention.
Sounds to me like Pterry noticed something was screwy with the way things fit together in the timeline, and then came up with a clever explanation. XD
And now that that's over... I haven't mentioned yet, but we've got an extra dog this week (dog-sitting for a friend). Hyperactive, non-housebroken, ill-mannered.
Anyway. Ji - you remember how we were trying to figure out how Small Gods fits into the Discworld timeline? I'm rereading Thief of Time at the moment, and I think I found the answer. It doesn't.
The history of the country of Ephebe was puzzling, for example. Either its famous philosophers lived for a very long time, or inherited their names, or extra bits had been stitched into history there. The history of Omnia was a mess. Two centuries had been folded into one, by the look of it, and it was only because of the mind-set of the Omnians, whose religion mixed the past and future with the present in any case, that it could possibly have passed unnoticed.
--page 157 of the American (far as I know, anyway...) hardback. Susan reading up on history and paying attention.
Sounds to me like Pterry noticed something was screwy with the way things fit together in the timeline, and then came up with a clever explanation. XD
And now that that's over... I haven't mentioned yet, but we've got an extra dog this week (dog-sitting for a friend). Hyperactive, non-housebroken, ill-mannered.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 04:41 pm (UTC)... Pterry hurts my brain, sometimes.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 08:15 pm (UTC)mind-bending is the best description I've come up with. (And it's even literal in at least one case! XD)
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 04:42 pm (UTC)*Only nicer because they're not me.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 07:09 pm (UTC)Never Let You Go Jack-oh wait, she did.no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 07:21 pm (UTC)And she did, didn't she? Defeats the purpose of the sop.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 07:24 pm (UTC)Makes me giggle.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 07:27 pm (UTC)But that's because it's prolly my longest-standing obsession.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 07:30 pm (UTC)I do remember his getting up to cover the TV so we could watch Jack draw instead of any actual nakedosity though. "Look at the shading!" said he.
Snicker.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 07:55 pm (UTC)I even had an internal editor when I was ten: No no no this is 1912 WHY IS FDR ON THAT DIME?!
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 08:08 pm (UTC)Good. On. You.
PS: ...dime?
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 08:15 pm (UTC)I don't remember any dimes.
But it has been Many Years Or Something.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-16 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-17 04:57 am (UTC)